Ms Robinson is always flattered to receive complimentary emails about her blog. Inevitably the correspondent will raise the question of why Ms R is not being paid for a column and Ms R will have to reply that clearly she does not possess the required degree of dullness, myopia and small mindedness necessary to work on a major news title. Readers will know that Ms R does not think much of the female media agenda, largely run by middle class women who can't see past their own front door (no doubt located in one of London's more desirable suburbs).
This is a subject that Ms R recently discussed with Suzanne Portnoy. Like Ms R, Suzanne is an opinionated blogger. She is also over 40, single and loves sex. However that's where the similarity ends. Suzanne is a sex blogger who enjoys swinging, saunas, black guys and big cocks; all things she'll openly tell you. Ms R is not partial to any of those things but even if she were she wouldn't tell you, preferring to keep the intimate details of her life to herself. Suzanne won't do attached men unless they've told their wives: Ms R is starting to see why that is a good idea.
Anyway Ms R read an interview with Suzanne in which she said she'd like to meet Ms R. A meeting was arranged at Shoreditch House. After greetings were exchanged and the necessary character assassination formalities dispatched, they got to talking. Suzanne has recently published her second book, The Not So Invisible Woman, that deals with her experiences.
"Suze I think it's interesting that when the Times interviewed you they didn't seem to be able to cope with your lifestyle. I believe the article called you a 'middle-aged sex maniac'. And a deviant. Are you?
"As far as women are concerned the media only have about two stories: one is that you are a mother married to a lawyer or banker and struggling to maintain your identity, in the face of trying to have children, career, big house etc. The other is that you're a hard bitten single career woman who has missed out on babies and is mostly regretting it. The whole agenda appears to revolve around marriage, work or babies but never, ever women's sexuality. And so someone like me comes along who, if she were 28, would be regarded as ok. But because I'm in my forties and a mother of two teenage boys, I'm apparently disgusting. That's women judging women. I grew up when all the great feminists of our day were writing and I consider myself one: that to me means having choices and now it seems it's women, as well as men, who are limiting the choices."
"Let's go back a bit to your celibate marriage and explain how you got here."
"As you say the sex had gone a long time ago and I suddenly realised I couldn't live like this. I started an affair with a guy I met on the internet and discovered all sorts of things about myself with a man in a similar situation. It was a real awakening for me and I wanted to experiment more. So then I began going to swinging clubs - I now have regular swinging partners whom I've had for years - and dating different men. The thing is I only have four days a month when the boys are not with me so it's not like I'm doing it every night. Believe it or not there is a strict structure to my life."
"But it's the fact you're doing it and talking about it can be enough to piss people off. Also there are many women (and men) who are struggling with a lack of sex and fulfillment in their own lives but don't want to acknowledge it. And so I think people like you upset and threaten both men and women at a stage of life where their greatest thrill is now the regular dinner party with friends round the corner and maybe a tiny bit of middle class drug taking."
"Absolutely and then when you say you don't want monogamy, oh my god you may as well just set yourself on fire."
"You don't want it I know and you seem genuine but I wonder if you will want it. I think I want it but then I'm not sure if I can trust it. As I get older the idea of trusting my emotions to someone is too, too scary.
"I just don't think I need it. I've had my kids and they're great boys. I have my house. And I like having different sexual partners. People ask me if I miss having a man sitting across the table to have a glass of wine with and my response is that I can have that if I want. I don't need him living in."
"One thing I'm heartily sick of is the attitude that still exists where because I'm single I know women that won't invite me to gatherings because they think I'll run off with their husbands or something which is utter rubbish. And then there's the question I get from men who seem suspicious that someone who is in good shape, reasonably cute and adores sex (and can cook) is 'on the market'. It makes me feel like a misfit and then I almost (not quite) envy these women who I think live without desire or courage. But it's much easier for society to accept them than to accept someone like me who has neither a high powered career nor marriage and children at this age. I could have. I didn't. Choice or destiny. Who knows?"
"But Ms R the funny thing is they wish they could be like that: they'd love to be able to explore their sexuality and their lives generally in a much bigger way, but they can't/won't so now they look at middle class type women who do and think " traitor/slut." They don't think that they are really not that far away from me; they think about what life could be like but then social pressures are too great so they stay in the unhappy marriage or whatever. And then they read about someone like me- who is probably an extreme in some ways - and see a 'deviant.' I'm not: I'm just living my life as honestly as I can. Addressing my lifestyle as deviant is just closing off the debate and putting sex in the 'naughty' box."
"But that's so British isn't it? Suzanne it's been a pleasure."
"Shall we have some cake?"
Saturday, 29 March 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


32 comments:
go for it ladies,I am sure that I would in your situation...and did! I am in a monogamous phase for the moment, but why all this prejudice against certain choices...
Standards, double, triple, quadruple, standards within standards. Media: Plural of medium; well it certainly does take the middle road of mediocrity with relatively few exceptions. In this day who sets these 'standards'; who divines from the entrails of a gelded husband that married women are so much better off than unmarried women. Who dictates that a woman in her 40's can't have the life she wishes with or without a man or men. Who sends down a ukase from on high that single, divorced women with children are doing those children a major disservice and great harm by fucking 3, 4, 5, or more different men that they wish to fuck. Who mandates that single women of any age can't have a happy, fulfilling life with or without a goddamn man. At whose behest is there a regulation, dictum that women should be paid less than men for exactly the same job. What pronouncement from the gods on high states that without an Oxbridge, Harvard, or Yale diploma or their equivalents that a woman is unable to write a daily column in a prestigious journal or a non- prestigious journal for that matter. And the above goes for men too. You're in the same fricking boat. I'd like to meet the motherfuckers at whose bidding this bullshit is allowed to exist. What group set up shop and handed down all these incredible, unutterably insidiously stupid fucking tenets. I give up: tell me, who? I'd really like to know. Betcha not one of them can write novels like Toni Morrison, write a column in the NY Times like Anne Applebaum whose won I don't know how many prestigious awards. Betcha they couldn't run a company like Chanel or Schiaparelli. I know that men, I suppose you can say those power-hungry bastards men, who run companies/conglomerates have much do to with it, especially women's salaries. But it's also men who think they have the right to control their spouses, lady friends, and whomever they damn well please and any way they damn well please. Bastards all. And small-minded women have a lot to do with it too. You bet your sweet arse they do.And it's not only in the UK; it's in the States too and very much worse here, as this society, and I hesitate to use that word, is so splintered. So what are intelligent people to do. OK, I have a really basic solution: tell them all to take a flying fuck at a rolling donut. Women and men need to think for themselves and if they're in a situation they feel is burdening them with stupidities of any stripe, then they need to stand up and do something about their lives, but and a very large but this is: PLAN AHEAD. You have to economically; there's no way around this simple fact. So I'm telling you nothing you don't already know. I'm living the life I wish--I have a lady whom I care about but she's free--anytime she wants she can leave and I'm not going to whine about it or play the pathetic jerk. I'm too old for that shit. I see no reason why any one has to judge me, or Ms R, or Ms Portnoy or any one. I don't judge and I don't expect to be judged and I know many women and menwho feel exactly the same. And if I'm this way and I know many men who feel the same as I. Anyone who has the gall to judge me better be ready for a major battle, because I'll give it to them--So should you all.
OK I'm off me soapbox :-)
Beau who's a tad hot under the collar and needs a pint or three
in Seattle
Or it may just come down to this:
Listen! Billy Pilgrim has come unstuck in time
Beau who's going to Billy Pilgrim it to and in my local.
*Stands up and applauds Beau*
I was thinking so many of those thoughts as I read the interview.
Along with enjoying the fact that both ladies wanted to have me at the end :)
It's men who set the tone of perceived acceptable behaviour and also its converse. But it's their narrow minded spouses that support them in it.
Coupledom is deemed to be de rigeur and woe betide you if you try to buck the trend and be more independent. And God forbid that you might decide that you need more than one other person to provide for your many diverse needs.
Thank you for discussing this topic, Ms R... and thank you to Beau for his thoughts. How I wish there were more men in this world who felt the way he does. Oh, who am I kidding - women need to get off their high horses too!
Dear Helga--Women do not need to get of their collective high horses. They need to stand up and boot the bastard of a boss in the bollocks as they leave their job. Preferably with a large grin on their faces. So do men as a matter of fact. Time to go just a tad on the loony side. Right?
Beau
Fascinating, thanks for the reporting. I bet the two of you over cake were something.
Whew, I couldn't live Suzanne's life! I'm exhausted just thinking about it. Seriously, though, I suspect not many people could or would, if given the opportunity. And I also suspect not because the vast majority are middle class and repressed, but because their motors just don't run in the same way.
Your comment: "Living without desire or courage" hits the nail on the head, but it doesn't just apply to sexuality. I think most people live unexamined lives. What's easier, to do the very tough, scary work to figure it all out or to give up and give in to one of society's default roles? If I take away anything from Suzanne's example it's not that, woo hoo! she's footloose and fancy free, but, hey, seems to me she's living honestly.
Does anyone really expect the mainstream media to reflect their lives? I mean it's a bit like asking the Sun to report real news...never going to happen. I just mean why even care if the only images of women in the female press are career bitch or disillusioned housewife? There are the same number of stereotypes about men in the media too I would say.
Rosie: I'm not making a claim for anything just saying that it's interesting that women's sexuality over a certain age is an issue as are lifestyles that don't fit the norm. If I wasn't so terrified then I'd love a relationship but there you go. I don't necessarily agree with Suze's choices but they are just as valid.
Beau: It must be raining over there! Thank you for your contribution and encouragement..always.
Moi: You have hit the nail on the head. It was Suze's honesty that struck me most of all - she'll hit you over the head with it but that's just her and as you can imagine it's very different from my own. But you're right she's not saying 'whoo hoo' she's just saying, "I've found a way of living right now that works for me." And I can't hope to emphathise with her marriage, children situation etc but she has an order to her life and it works.
Courage and desire are hard for most people. They lack the former and will keep the latter under wraps often to live the life they think they should be living. That doesn't just refer to sexual behaviour but everything.
Cake: You know when I was doing the book for Jacqueline Gold (the lady who owns Ann Summers) she was telling me that people still said to her, "Oh it's a shame you're single". Funny stuff.
Helga: We all judge too much. I do it too. I just wanted to make the point that while we don't agree with others, their choices are equally valid. That doesn't mean they shouldn't be questioned but we can do it in a thoughtful way.
Emma: Emma I'm not advocating Suzanne's life nor asking the media too. However I noted that when she was interviewed the questions were designed to put her on the defensive rather than asking "What does this give you? Can it last? Will you regret that you didn't see out a relationship etc" As I said this is about being intelligent about life and yes, we should expect more from the media because it influences the dialogue and reinforces prejudices. That can be as simple as an article by a single woman saying how scary it is to be single and over 35 (fucking rubbish).
Emma: I meant the proliferation of articles by women whinging about being single can make it seem an undesirable state and therefore discourage many women.
damn her and her deviance! sex and fun on HER OWN TERMS. that's not what it's about, surely... well we aren't having any of that so....
double damn her and her deviance!
but i hold no brief for people who want to 'take a flying fuck at a rolling donut' that's just perverted!
(ooh ms r - i didn't know you could cook... i begin to find you strangely attractive)(or attractively strange?)
The only desire expressed in women's magazines these days seems to be over the purchase of stupidly priced ugly handbags.
Me...I'm not a fan of sex blogs- they bore me to be honest, but I realise I'm in the minority. But when the media takes an interest, it is never to show other choices or lifestyles for women, it is only to parade the writers of them as freaks and snigger at them.
The women who write women's magazines are no different from the huddled middle aged WI women pointing at the unmarried mother having the gall to turn up at their church social.
I wouldn't want to belong to their club. I'm glad you don't either.
And that's the beauty of blogging- you get to read about real women with no agenda, who actually want to write honestly for no money or free handbags.
Oh and real men too.
More interviews please- if a blogger can't reveal the respectful truth about other bloggers, then who will?
A very interesting chat, I look forward to the book, and it raised some very good points – as did Beau.
The media stereotypes seem to be a hangover from some kind of Madonna/whore complex that infects many societies, at least in the eyes of male editors. Too many articles about people who blog on sex and relationships are purulently held up as freaks (see most of the coverage about girlwithaonetrackmind and others) or sad figures, rather than considering the serious choices they have made.
But is it the case for women editors?
I was discussing something similar with a female friend and she was of the opinion that it’s fear that drives this disparagement of female sexuality by women. A single woman who enjoys an active love life can be seen as a threat to someone who’s insecure about their relationship. After all, the thinking goes, 'she must be having sex with someone and maybe it’s my boyfriend'.
It’s also worth noting that there is a similar, if less serious, problem for men. If you’ve never married and have no desire to you’re either assumed to be a cad, an emotional cripple who can’t relate or a Narnian (so far in the closet you’ve forgotten there’s a door). The simpler answer, that you’re having fun, don’t want kids and see no reason to change, somehow missed the list.
Misssy: Enough of the must have handbag and the ugly show. I'm just sick of this homogenous lifestyle stuff and interestingly my best friend who has the husband, big house etc agrees that the media do not help the debate. I think Suzanne was a good place to start because her lifestyle isn't something I would follow but at the same time there is a truth in it. More interviews as I think of them.
SW: I am a very fine cook as it happens. And also a seamstress when I want to be. Thoroughly domesticated but it seems to surprise people.
Silicon Limey: Suzanne did say interestingly that she's not a fan of younger sex bloggers since shagging around is what you're supposed to do at that age! I think Girl with a one Track Mind has probably given men a fair few insights - my quarrel with her is that she has since tried to wrap it up in some radical feminist agenda when in fact she's just doing what young single women do and should just stop trying to over intellectualise. In fairness I think it's taken her to a place she's not intellectually ready for.
I think it's much tougher for the older women who live 'alternative' lifestyles - as Suzanne pointed out she's seen as some kind of freak when in fact I found her to be a smart woman who is as sorted as anyone would be.
I've had friends not introduce me to boyfriends because they think something will happen- based on their own loose ethics. That is rubbish: I can find my own men.And I agree that a bloke who goes his own way is likely to have his own pressures.
How awful is that, that someone potentially fabulously interesting would be excluded from a circle of friendship and warmth out of fear or jealousy? You'd think the opposite would be true, right? "Ooo, that seems like a great person, I want to get to know her." But check out your next large social gathering and notice which women are getting positive attention from the men and which are getting positive attention from the women. They won't be the same.
I suppose there's a biological component to all this – the best looking, most confident women are highly valued as breeders. But then again, in my experience, the few women I've known who were out-and-out predatory of other women's men were in actuality dull as doorknobs, both in looks and personality. And it does take two to tango. Really, do these women have some kind of Vulcan Mind Meld properties? What about the role the man plays in it all? Aren't we stereotyping them when we think they're just mindless penis-brains incapable of either discernment or self control?
I think many people assume that someone who is sexy, intelligent, good company and all the other good stuff, yet is mature and still single must be 'too good to be true'.
They are very short sighted.
I get asked often what is wrong with me or what is the catch. I tend not to answer, if they assume there must be one.
Vulcan mind meld? No, it's more subtle than that. I has to do with posture, eyes, body movement and an aura of I've got mine bitch, leave mine alone. Men don't enter into it. At all. They're only there for show. In fact I really think men are totally oblivious of this. They talk with their mates and it's the women to watch. In a bar some evening, a place where young marrieds especially gather , just watch and I think you'll see what I'm talking about and by young I mean 25-40 age group. What these women perceive as a predatory woman entering within their field is telegraphed instantaneously within the group and defenses go up. It's almost like a bloody war. Amazing to watch. I swear I see this all the time in my local.
Beau
I was born in london nearly 44 years ago, I left in my late twenties having married someone who everyone thought was the right one. Parents, parents in law, everyone. Big party, good fun the best. We went to live in rural France, I wanted a garden, coulndn`t afford one in London.
After a couple of years my older, and already potentially alcoholic husband fell foul to rural french life and I had an affair with a serial marriage breaker (another story). He left, I stayed.
I had trouble making friends. Most women saw me as a threat. I was. Most of their husbands did try, and if they didn`t, perhaps i did, maybe i did have needy eyes. I didn`t go without.
After six or seven years a family death took me to Australia, and I got pregnant.
I am now about to leave a mother in law and three sisters who have judged me so and lowered my self esteem such that I have delved so far to realise that if I am happy with who I am it doesn`t relly matter what other people think because that is their problem. If I take my higher moral stand it will,perhaps, elevate them to who I want to be.
My morality lies with me.
Moi: that is a very astute observation about predatory women - and brings to mind the dull, homely women who've been involved in public 'scandals' in this country. As for the role of men, well it's interesting to note that women seem to get more upset at 'the other woman' than at their partner suggesting he was incorruptible until SHE came along. Twas always thus.
Midnight: I know it's silly isn't it - the implication that if you were that good you wouldn't be in this place. I'm sure men get it but it's worse for women. People are so suspicious of you but as you say, it's their problem.
Beau: I am not predatory at all but because I'm outgoing and can chat happily to anybody I'm perceived as so by girls who are insecure and have no personality. In truth a girl I knew years ago who was a classic beauty, a real beauty was perceived as less dangerous than I was. Beautiful is ok. But attractive and witty is not. Ok. Go figure. Ah, they can all fuck off.
Claudia: I love your sheer honesty and your power of thought Claudia. Hugs. x
Suzanne is certainly interesting. And she lays to the rest the old joke, "What's the difference between a J.A.P. and Jello? Jello moves when you eat it."
Screwing around in your 40s can be dull. After 13 years in a sexless marriage to a nice Catholic girl who looked liked Doris Day, I hit the singles scene pretty hard. A 25 year old who thought she was an old sage and dressed like a hooker. A 50 year old who wore Chanel suits, had great legs but was a Republican. A PR company owner who drank more than I did.
Anyway, after 13 years of no sex, suddenly it was everywhere. And I was taking it. And I felt like shit. And that shit feeling grew deep inside of me. One night I told a woman who owned her own headhunting company that I was only interested in her for sex. I had no intention of anything else with every hope she'd tell me to go fuck a rolling donut. Of course, she didn't. And I felt like shit and was hungover the next morning.
Can someone tell me where I can take a class or something? Or, do I need to do the things that make me feel good about myself? Is it that simple?
Tintin: We all get like this. On the weekend I played with my godchildren. I derived enormous pleasure watching a fourteen month old baby throw food on the floor as he decided he didn't like any of it. Of course he knew we were laughing.
Screwing around in your forties is dull. I like sex but I prefer to have less quality sex than sex all the time. I think partly I'm afraid of getting thrown off course with some stupid infatuation. But that doesn't mean I don't want anyone to care about me. It gets harder. Don't feel bad about what you did: we're all human and we've all fucked around (emotionally) and got it wrong. It's only life after all.
A class? Dunno. I find when I'm around things that make me smile and where I can contribute I'm happy.
"Screwing around in your forties is dull"
Says who?
It's fun in your fifties too...
and another thing
The answer to crap journalism is to STOP FUCKING READING IT!
I don't buy the Sun, nor the Express or Mai. I don't buy the Mirror, the Guardian, nor do I read any of the magazines that talk about the lives of various nonentity ex reality tv fodder.
If we all STOP FUCKING READING IT then they will STOP FUCKING WRITING IT.
Phrases expressed in capitals should be read as though they were written in green crayon.
Freddy is off to prepare placards for his STOP FUUCKING READING IT march.
Good stuff I felt like a fly on the wall. That was a nice intelligent conversation to read between you two blog titans. Of course, I'd personally prefer you shout your love for black men and their big cocks from the rafters, but alas we'll allow you to keep that secret;-)
Oh Mrs. R., unfortunately I've had to turn the madonna/slut tables around in my life. There are proper men that I date, and men that I privately fuck. I don't don't think that it does any woman any good to be public about her sex life as Portnoy has done.
I can assure you that it's not healthy for her sons and they will resent her for her public airing of her swinging black cock loving personal life...even if she only lives that life 4 days a month.
Sad perhaps, but true.
Alas, I have not had a big black man with a big black cock for some time and have moved onto middle-aged, pasty white guys. I can assure you my children were happier with the former.
Fury: Thank you.
Freddy: I think by 'screwing around' Tintin doesn't mean having an affair or two but indiscriminate screwing.
Belle: It's an interesting one, a judgement call I suppose. Not having kids I have no idea how it might work.
ms r - your skills with a needle and thread are as broccoli to me whereas food is just above sex and just below cricket in my list of favourite things. (and yes, that is the top bit)
why are you looking at me like that?
what?
WHAT???
SW: Oh dear this is getting dangerous: Ms R adores cricket and you will enjoy the next post because it merges cricket and sex....Food is a joy..to me it goes well with both cricket and sex.
As for the sewing well I was just just trying to point out that when I wasn't being an object of sexual desire I could do other things.
I find there are plenty of women in their 40s, 50s and 60s (both married and unmarried) who are interested in no-strings sex with a married man!
There is no such thing as no strings sex really unless it's a one night stand. The problem with it that you will have this intense time with an attached man and then he can't talk to you or he feels guilty et etc. Personally if we're talking fun sex I prefer younger men who are single - they are the most unencumbered by anything.
But - and this is not to diminish you in anyway at all - some women are desperate. For me I need brains charm and humour to enjoy the sex..all the things I'd need in any relationship
Sure women pretend they're doing the No Strings thing but you don't know that while they're pretending they're fine they are struggling with it. I think more like a man than most women but in the end to have the best sex; the kind of sex where you know each other, you have to like someone and once you do that, you're on a rocky road where, without realising it, you're becoming emotionally dependent.
Post a Comment